The critique of pure phenomenology
نویسنده
چکیده
The topic of this paper is phenomenology. How should we think of phenomenology – the discipline or activity of investigating experience itself – if phenomenology is to be a genuine source of knowledge? This is related to the question whether phenomenology can make a contribution to the empirical study of human or animal experience. My own view is that it can. But only if we make a fresh start in understanding what phenomenology is and can be.
منابع مشابه
A Study and Critique of Moral Liberalism Based on perspective "Existence of pure connection” Mulla Sadra
Moral liberalism is based on the separation of moral values from reality and emphasizes that the criterion of moral-value is the "person himself". In liberal ethics, one's happiness depends on himself and moral values have a relative meaning. According to Mulla Sadra, the process of creation in the arch of descent is based on manifestation and the effects are the pure connection to the cause an...
متن کاملComparative Study of Architectural Phenomenology in Theories of Juhani Pallasmaa and Steven Holl
Phenomenology as one of the philosophical fields of the twentieth century, was used in the last decades of this century as an effective approach to better understanding in architectural theorizing. The present study examines the viewpoints of Juhani Pallasmaa and Steven Holl through their key concepts, with the aim of showing the commonalities and differences of their views and explaining more ...
متن کاملPhenomenological Interpretation of Descartes
Phenomenology questions the basic foundations of Modernity. In particular, it challenges Descartes‘ attempt to found the scientific method with absolute certainty. Phenomenology is defined by the work of Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Even though each of them developed their own way within Phenomenology, their theories are determined by a critique of the Cartesian method. For them, Desc...
متن کاملMarcuse’s Phenomenology: Reading Chapter Six of One-Dimensional Man1
In a critique of my views on Marcuse’s relation to phenomenology, John Abromeit claims that Marcuse’s borrowings from Heidegger and Husserl are limited to the notion that modern science and technology are not neutral but are biased toward the domination of nature.2Abromeit thinks I exaggerate the importance of phenomenology for Marcuse in claiming more than this. Rather than replying to the det...
متن کاملجایگاه روایت در تفسیر تسنیم
Tasneem, the Holy Qurān interpretation, is a comprehensive and contemporary exegesis that approaches the Holy Qurān with a multilateral perspective. Moreover, the moral character and comprehensive knowledge of the writer necessitate more attention to this unique exegesis. The interpreter has endeavored to present a pure Qurānic exegesis, yet narration has been used extensively in his exegesis. ...
متن کامل